When an enterprise rolls out transparent encryption, it often summarizes the requirement with a single sentence — “automatically encrypt R&D documents.” Only after go-live does the team discover that the truly hard problem is “which software is allowed to open encrypted files.” Engineering uses IDEs, design uses CAD, contracts use Office, audit uses PDF readers. Once the authorized software list is unclear, employees either complain that “the file no longer opens after encryption” or open encrypted files in software they shouldn’t be using, dissolving the protection. Ping64 places the heart of transparent encryption not just on “encrypt or not” but on “which software is authorized to decrypt.” Encrypted files, authorized software, and the security domain hierarchy are linked into a single governance pipeline.
The Hard Part of Transparent Encryption Is the Authorized Software List, Not the Algorithm
The most underestimated component of transparent encryption is the authorized software list. The applications employees use day to day are not a fixed handful: R&D simultaneously runs different code editors, drawing tools, and document compare utilities; finance and legal use Office, WPS, PDF readers, and dedicated audit software; manufacturing also brings multiple CAD, CAM, and PLM clients into the picture. If the authorized software list does not cover the full business chain, encrypted files become “assets that cannot be opened.” If the list is too broad, the leak-prevention value of encryption is diluted. Ping64 manages authorized software as a precondition for transparent encryption, turning the encryption policy from a simple switch into a capability that evolves alongside software assets.
The Collaboration and Leakage Pressure That Builds Up When the List Slips
A loose authorized software list creates a typical set of problems. The first is collaboration friction: employees report that encrypted files cannot open in their usual tools, and either bypass the policy or demand that IT decrypt files for them. The second is loss of confidentiality: opening encrypted files in unauthorized software that still understands the format effectively reverts encrypted data to clear-text circulation. The third is leaver-investigation chaos: departing employees may deliberately use unauthorized software to read encrypted files, capture screenshots, transcribe content, or send it out, leaving little trail through the authorization chain. The fourth is a compliance audit blind spot: regulators or customer auditors expect proof that encryption actually works, but without an authorized software list and encryption logs the answer is unprovable. Ping64 weaves transparent encryption policy, authorized software, the document transparent encryption overview, and encryption records into one auditable pipeline so these pressures can be managed explicitly.
Building Transparent Encryption and Authorized Software Governance on the Ping64 Console
The path below is one an administrator can execute directly inside the Ping64 console. The aim is to bind transparent encryption policy, authorized software, security domain attributes, and encryption records into a single line.
Map the File Types That Need Encryption to Business Roles
Step 1: Sign in to the Ping64 console, open the Transparent Encryption group under the Data Security module, and start with the Document Transparent Encryption Overview. Ping64 surfaces current policy coverage, encryption and decryption execution, key lifecycle, and decryption-request trends across the enterprise. From here, identify the file types that should be encrypted: source code, CAD drawings, contracts, financial reports, design assets, customer materials, and so on.
Step 2: On the Security Attributes page, define the security domains and security levels for transparent encryption and bind them to endpoint groups. Ping64 lets you map R&D, finance, and legal into different security domains, and tiers like “general,” “confidential,” and “secret” into different security levels. Subsequent policies can then differentiate by domain and level rather than applying one rule to everyone.
Configure the Authorized Software List
Step 3: Open the Authorized Software page and click “Add authorized software.” In the wizard, add common applications by real business role: an R&D authorized list might include the main code editors, version control clients, and build tooling; a design list might include the main CAD and PLM clients; a general office list might include Office, WPS, and PDF readers. Ping64 identifies authorization targets by software fingerprint and publisher certificate so renaming installers cannot bypass the list.
Step 4: Maintain the Authorized Software list grouped by business line so each encryption policy maps to a clear set of authorized software. Ping64 keeps software name, parent security domain, accessible security levels, and applicable endpoints on the list, supporting audit-side review of authorization scope.
Configure Encryption Policy and the Decryption Request Path
Step 5: On the Transparent Encryption policy page, create a new policy. Bind the encryption target to the relevant file types and directories, and bind the Authorized Software list to the policy’s decryption access. Ping64 supports composite conditions across security domain, security level, directory, and file type, so a single policy covers only its needed range rather than encrypting everything indiscriminately.
Step 6: Configure the Decryption Request path inside the policy. When an employee genuinely needs to share an encrypted file outside, the Ping64 client lets them raise a decryption request that data security or a department head reviews. Once approved, Ping64 allows the decryption action within a defined window and keeps the request reason, approver, and timestamp in the encryption record.
Review Encryption Records and Coverage
Step 7: Open the Encryption Records page under the Transparent Encryption module and search encrypt, decrypt, and request-approval actions by endpoint, user, security domain, and file type. Ping64 keeps process name, operating endpoint, file path, action type, and parent security level in each record for downstream forensics. Pay particular attention to events like “unauthorized software attempted access,” which signals possible bypass attempts.
Step 8: Return to the Document Transparent Encryption Overview to look at key lifecycle, encryption execution coverage, and decryption-request trends. Ping64 presents the running state of the transparent encryption system from an enterprise-wide vantage point, helping the security team decide whether to extend the authorized software list, tighten the security level mapping, or adjust the decryption-request approval cadence.
This pipeline addresses document behavior that is identifiable, encryptable, and auditable on the endpoint side; it does not replace the security-classification regime itself. But once Ping64’s transparent encryption policies, authorized software list, security domains and levels, and encryption records form a complete loop, the common dilemma of “encrypted but uncontrolled” can be turned into “encryption, authorization, and auditing as a unified posture.”
Transparent Encryption as a Governance Capability Aligned With Software Assets
By keeping transparent encryption, authorized software, the security domain hierarchy, and encryption records in a single console, Ping64 turns enterprise encryption from a single switch into a portfolio of policy assets that evolve in step with software inventory, endpoint groups, and business processes. After Ping64 has been running for a sustained period, what the enterprise accumulates is more than the encrypted files themselves: it is a comprehensive asset spanning security domains, security levels, authorized software, and encryption records, giving the data security team, the compliance team, and the business units a consistent reference point inside the Ping64 console the next time encryption-related decisions are on the table.
Contact
7 min 
