The drawings, schematics, source code, and process documents produced every day by engineering and design teams are some of the most overlooked yet most easily lost assets in any enterprise. Unlike contracts, they are not quietly resting in a filing cabinet. They are opened, saved, copied and forwarded all day long. A single careless “save as” or one borrowed laptop can hand years of design work to a competitor. The transparent encryption system inside the Ping64 console is built precisely to pull this everyday loss of control back into a managed perimeter, so that encryption happens silently in the background instead of relying on the conscious goodwill of every engineer every minute of every day.
Real-World Leakage Paths for Design Assets and the Blind Spots of Traditional Encryption
In the actual workflow of a CAD engineer, firmware developer, or algorithm researcher, the lifecycle of a single file is far more complex than “save it to drive D”. An assembly drawing might be opened in SolidWorks, saved out as an intermediate revision, screenshotted to a supplier to discuss dimensions, packaged and zipped for an external contractor. Source code is cloned to a local repository, packaged and built, and produces PDB debug symbols. At every one of these moments, traditional “manual encryption” or “archive password” approaches leave a vacuum in which sensitive content can quietly walk out the door.
Many organizations begin with the model of “engineers encrypt by clicking a menu themselves”. That model looks flawless during a demo and almost always fails on the late nights leading up to a real delivery deadline. Under pressure people decide to “just send it now and worry later”, they forget the right-click, and they assume that the internal network is safe enough. Ping64 removes that step that depends on a person actively choosing the safe path; encryption is instead driven by policies and process behaviour, and the engineer barely notices it happening at all.
Another high-risk situation for design assets is outsourcing and cross-site collaboration. A drawing goes to a supplier for prototyping, three months later the sample comes back, but the file itself may have been quietly passed around several times inside the supplier’s organization. Ping64 binds the two ends of that chain together — the original ciphertext on the originating endpoint and the controlled rendering on the receiving end — so that the drawing leaves the originator as ciphertext, arrives at the partner under the right permissions, and the engineer has to do nothing extra at any point.
What Transparent Encryption Really Means Inside Ping64
Ping64 treats transparent encryption as a backbone that runs through document security governance, not as an isolated on/off switch. Sitting under the document encryption business in the console are at least six interlocking lines: authorized software, transparent encryption and decryption policies, encryption rules, classification and security domains, behaviour auditing, and decryption approval. Each of these speaks to a specific worry from the R&D floor.
Why Authorized Software and Process Allowlists Matter
When engineers are working, they are rarely using one or two applications. CAD masters, PDM clients, Office, PDF readers, IDEs, Git clients, text editors and screenshot tools all routinely come into contact with sensitive files. The “authorized software” list inside Ping64 is precisely the allowlist of which processes are permitted to read and write ciphertext normally. Any process outside that list reads only scrambled bytes, which severs the path of “drag this drawing into a chat app” or “save as into a random editor”.
Classification, Security Domains and Least Privilege
The classification model in Ping64 is not just a label of “confidential” or “internal” stamped onto a file. It interacts jointly with security domains, endpoint groups and authorized software. A workstation that only verifies prototypes can be granted the ability to open “internal” drawings only; the head of engineering can open “confidential” drawings yet still be unable to send them externally. These combinations are all expressed inside the Ping64 console as policies, with no need to touch every endpoint by hand.
The Audit Loop Means Transparent Does Not Mean Invisible
A common misconception is that transparent encryption hides everything from users and administrators alike. The opposite is true. Inside Ping64 the behaviour audit page and the transparent encryption and decryption event view both retain complete records of every automatic encryption, manual encryption, decryption request and classification change. Any unusual bulk save-as, cross-classification access, or unauthorized process read can be reconstructed accurately after the fact.
A Hands-On Guide to Rolling Transparent Encryption Out in the Ping64 Console
The path below is a concrete sequence for taking transparent encryption from zero to fully running across an R&D organization. Every action is performed inside the same Ping64 console sidebar; the target is to have the silent protection layer covering all engineering workstations within two to three business days.
- Open the document encryption business on the left side of the Ping64 console and go to the overview page. Inside the document transparent encryption security overview card, confirm the currently connected endpoint count, encryption execution count, and the latest pending decryption requests. Do not configure anything at this step; this is to capture a baseline so that subsequent policy adjustments have something to compare against. Verification is done by observing whether the share split in the encryption method overview matches the real-world state of the engineering department; if the share looks clearly off, it indicates that the existing coverage of policies is incomplete.
- Switch to the application section in the left menu and open the security domain and classification maintenance pages, which unify security domain and classification definitions across the platform. In the classification list create or confirm two levels, “Engineering Internal” and “Engineering Confidential”, and set the applicable department to the engineering centre. In the security domain page create two domains, “Drawing Domain” and “Source Code Domain”, and clearly define classification boundaries, endpoint coverage and the basis on which they take effect. The effective targets are all endpoints in the engineering centre group. Verification is done by returning to the list and checking that the statistic showing the current classification library count reflects the new entries, and that the warning “deleting a classification may affect existing files and policy usage” appears correctly when an accidental delete is attempted.
- Open the authorized software page on the left, and add the key processes such as the CAD master application, the PDM client, the IDE, and the version-control client. Inside each entry switch to the advanced tab and fill in process name, file description and digital signature checks, so that only genuine official builds are admitted. The applicable scope is the same engineering group. Verification is done by switching to any endpoint in that group, opening an already-encrypted .dwg drawing with an authorized application — it should read and save normally — while opening it with a non-authorized portable editor should produce garbled content.
- Enter the policy editor under transparent encryption and decryption and create a policy called “Engineering Drawing Transparent Encryption”. Choose “Always Transparent When Risky” as the encryption mode, enable the “Use Policy File Types” option, and restrict the file extensions in scope to dwg, step, prt, sldprt, c, cpp, h, py and similar formats. In the encryption rules limit the target paths to the engineering drive and the code repository directories. Set the effective target to the engineering centre group and bind the classifications and security domains created in the previous step. Verification is done by creating a new file with a target extension on a test endpoint, filling it with content, and after saving it returning to the behaviour audit page of the Ping64 console; a matching automatic encryption event should appear, in which the process path, endpoint origin and file trail all line up with the actual operation.
- Return to the encryption and decryption trend card on the overview, and watch the curves for encryption execution volume and decryption requests on a daily basis. In the first week a small spike of decryption requests is usual, because some historical files are being absorbed into the encryption regime for the first time. Use this period to keep tuning the authorized software list and the policy file type set, so that the curve enters a steady state within two weeks.
For individual processes that cannot be brought under direct control because of compliance constraints or third-party limitations, such as simulation software that has to run under a dedicated account, the authorized software configuration in Ping64 allows a separate encryption execution count and verification rule count to be set for that process, while assigning a restricted security domain inside the policy. That is the compliant fallback path. When a partner process genuinely cannot be authorized, the full-disk encryption task can be used to unify protection at the storage layer; it is dispatched from the full-disk encryption and decryption task entry inside the application area, which keeps the system out of the vacuum of being neither transparently encrypted nor fully disk-encrypted.
Where the Six Lines Reinforce Each Other
These six lines — authorized software, encryption policies, encryption rules, classification, behaviour auditing and decryption approval — are not parallel features that happen to live in the same console. They actively reinforce each other inside Ping64. A classification level decides which security domain a file belongs to, the security domain narrows which authorized software can open it, the encryption policy decides whether new files inside a given path are encrypted automatically, and any deviation from these expectations surfaces on the behaviour audit page so that an administrator can ask the right questions before the situation becomes a real incident. When viewed as a single system rather than six separate checkboxes, Ping64 begins to feel less like an encryption tool and more like a quiet co-pilot for the engineering department.
Giving Engineers Back Real Confidence in Everyday Editing
The most valuable thing about transparent encryption has never been the cryptographic strength of any single rule. It is that the engineer on the front line no longer has to keep asking “should I encrypt this file?”. Ping64 collapses that judgement into a small number of policies inside the console: authorized software decides who can read, classification and security domains decide how data is layered, the transparent encryption policy decides when encryption fires automatically, and behaviour auditing together with decryption approval decides how anomalies surface and who is held accountable. The everyday workflow of an engineering department no longer has to bend itself out of shape for the sake of compliance; engineers can keep their attention on real design work, while every open, save and transfer of a drawing or piece of source code inside the Ping64 system is quietly protected in the background. That is exactly the kind of “invisible safety” Ping64 wants to hand to enterprises — transparent, continuous, auditable, and ready to explain exactly what happened the moment something does go wrong.
Contact
11 min 
